Which system suggests that there are no moral absolutes, and that what is deemed 'good' and 'bad' can be different from group to group?

Which system suggests that there are no moral absolutes, and that what is deemed 'good' and 'bad' can be different from group to group?

• A. Moral absolutism
• B. Ethical relativism
• C. Sub-cultural moralism
• D. Global relativism

Answer: (B)

The main idea being tested is that moral judgments are relative to the group or culture, not fixed for everyone. Ethical relativism holds that there are no universal moral truths; what is considered good or bad can vary from one group to another, depending on their norms and beliefs. This explains why different communities may disagree about right and wrong and why there isn’t a single, overarching standard that applies everywhere. In contrast, moral absolutism insists that certain actions are right or wrong in all circumstances, regardless of context, which contradicts the idea of varying group standards. The other labels aren’t the standard way to express this idea in ethics; ethical relativism is the recognized term for the claim that morality is culture- or group-relative.

The main idea being tested is that moral judgments are relative to the group or culture, not fixed for everyone. Ethical relativism holds that there are no universal moral truths; what is considered good or bad can vary from one group to another, depending on their norms and beliefs. This explains why different communities may disagree about right and wrong and why there isn’t a single, overarching standard that applies everywhere.

In contrast, moral absolutism insists that certain actions are right or wrong in all circumstances, regardless of context, which contradicts the idea of varying group standards. The other labels aren’t the standard way to express this idea in ethics; ethical relativism is the recognized term for the claim that morality is culture- or group-relative.